LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Rod Clearance Issue

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-21-2008, 07:22 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
RallyBoy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 242
Rod Clearance Issue

I have a problem. My 383 was being put together today and the builder ran into an issue with the rods hitting my camshaft. Rods are Eagle (part number SIR6000BBLW) and the camshaft is a Lingenfelter 211/219 (part number 74211). I thought the rods were clearanced from Eagle so that I would not have to run a small base circle camshaft.

Would it be best to take it to the machine shop and have them remove the rotating assembly to grind the rods and rebalance it? Or, should I just purchase a small base circle camshaft? I bought the camshaft from Lingenfelter about 4 months ago so I really don't think they would allow me to return it. What would be the safest way?
RallyBoy1 is offline  
Old 10-21-2008, 07:41 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
MachinistOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,001
I would not have used those rods to begin with, I don't like eagle products and a Scat Pro-I beam would have been a better choice with no clearance issues.

At this point you can either clearance the rods and rebalance, or buy the Scat's and re-balance...or IMO you should buy a bigger cam on a small base circle - that cam is itty-bitty for a 383
MachinistOne is offline  
Old 10-21-2008, 08:36 PM
  #3  
Moderator
 
rskrause's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 10,745
Grinding a little off the rod bolts will not require rebalancing. I agree with M1 about the rods.

Rich
rskrause is offline  
Old 10-21-2008, 08:54 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Cook Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 84
The rods need clearanced not the bolts.
Cook Performance is offline  
Old 10-21-2008, 09:09 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
<Puck>'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 321
The SIR I-beams are not the strongest rods around, so even though the 211/219 is tiny for a 383 I would stay on the smaller range for the cams anyway. Too much power for the parts used will lead to an early rebuild...

It seems that the cheapest way to get it up and running would be to take the hit and sell off the LPE cam, and have a slightly more agressive small base circle cam ground for you.

Good luck.
<Puck> is offline  
Old 10-21-2008, 09:25 PM
  #6  
Moderator
 
rskrause's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 10,745
Originally Posted by proflowjake
The rods need clearanced not the bolts.
Same principle, it will not need rebalancing.

Rich
rskrause is offline  
Old 10-21-2008, 09:33 PM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
RallyBoy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 242
Originally Posted by MachinistOne
I would not have used those rods to begin with, I don't like eagle products and a Scat Pro-I beam would have been a better choice with no clearance issues.
At this point you can either clearance the rods and rebalance, or buy the Scat's and re-balance...or IMO you should buy a bigger cam on a small base circle - that cam is itty-bitty for a 383
The Scat rods may have been a better choice but I have the Eagle now. I probably should have chosen the Scat's but there are many people who have had great sucess with Eagle products.

Originally Posted by proflowjake
Since you need a larger cam anyway, if you are confident in your rotating assembly then give Ron and Phil at Advanced Induction a call and get a custom grind billet small base circle cam for $400. www.advancedinduction.com. refered by Cook Peformance. It would be your best bet if you want to go the cheapest route. I have never had a problem using Eagle products.
Jake www.cpengines.com
A larger camshaft would make more power but I am not looking to build a race car. I just want a very nice daily driver that has great torque for the street. I chose this camshaft based off another member by the name of ABA383 who used this same camshaft in his 383 that was built by Lingenfelter. It may not have been the fastest thing on the road but he felt that it was a great daily driver and he was very satisfied. I think he drove on the set-up for approximately 12+ years.

So, the most economical way to handle this is to purchase another camshaft?
How expensive would it be to have the rods ground down and the assembly rebalanced?
Thanks for the responses gentlemen.
RallyBoy1 is offline  
Old 10-22-2008, 05:06 AM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
RallyBoy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 242
How do I know what size base circle to get? What is acceptable clearance between the cam and rods?

Last edited by RallyBoy1; 10-22-2008 at 05:15 AM.
RallyBoy1 is offline  
Old 10-22-2008, 07:18 AM
  #9  
Moderator
 
rskrause's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 10,745
As I said, it is NOT going to need rebalancing. Taking a few grams off is much less significant than adding weight.

Rich
rskrause is offline  
Old 10-22-2008, 07:58 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
quickSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Lexington Park, Maryland, USA
Posts: 473
I'm wondering if: even with a small base-circle camshaft that the rods might still hit the cam. It's possible don't you think?
The shape of those rods have so much big-end shoulder sticking up.
If it were my motor I'd just have the spot on the rod machined down and not do a rebalance.
Karl Ellwein
quickSS is offline  
Old 10-22-2008, 12:35 PM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
RallyBoy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 242
Originally Posted by quickSS
I'm wondering if: even with a small base-circle camshaft that the rods might still hit the cam. It's possible don't you think?
The shape of those rods have so much big-end shoulder sticking up.
If it were my motor I'd just have the spot on the rod machined down and not do a rebalance.
Karl Ellwein
You are right, there will still be a possibility of a small base circle cam interfering with the rods. I think I am going to have the rods machined down.

I know the camshaft is not desired by most but I was trying to copy ABA383's build. I figured it would make a excellent street car while maintaining great drivability.
RallyBoy1 is offline  
Old 10-22-2008, 01:07 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
user 647483's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,444
Originally Posted by quickSS
I'm wondering if: even with a small base-circle camshaft that the rods might still hit the cam. It's possible don't you think?
The shape of those rods have so much big-end shoulder sticking up.
If it were my motor I'd just have the spot on the rod machined down and not do a rebalance.
Karl Ellwein
If going custom, definitely inform the cam designer of what rotating assembly you are using.
He should be able to get you exactly what you need without a problem.

Originally Posted by RallyBoy1
So, the most economical way to handle this is to purchase another camshaft?
How expensive would it be to have the rods ground down and the assembly rebalanced?
Thanks for the responses gentlemen.
It seems like you need a more aggressive cam, that is the route I would go.
Depending on who is assembling your shortblock, machining the rods may or may not be a cheaper route.

FWIW, I'm running 6" Eagle forged rods and a custom cam from Bret Bauer and did not have any issues.
I think the rods you are using have a little more material though, it will likely require a little more planning.

Last edited by user 647483; 10-22-2008 at 01:12 PM.
user 647483 is offline  
Old 10-22-2008, 03:36 PM
  #13  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
RallyBoy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 242
Is there any disadvantage to machining the rods? Will this affect the longvity of the block?
RallyBoy1 is offline  
Old 10-22-2008, 04:16 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
bombebomb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,855
Originally Posted by RallyBoy1
Is there any disadvantage to machining the rods? Will this affect the longvity of the block?
I dout machining the rods have any thing to do with the longvity of the block. However, id get another opinion besides mine.
bombebomb is offline  
Old 10-22-2008, 08:48 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
RedLT4Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Helotes/San Antonio
Posts: 416
My Eagle Sir rods hit the cam the same as yours. My builder just ground them just enough for the cam to clear. No re-balance, no issues.

Run the cam you want. Only you know whats best for you.
RedLT4Mike is offline  


Quick Reply: Rod Clearance Issue



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:38 PM.