LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Side by side image of 643 vs. 561 castings inside..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-23-2006, 05:20 AM
  #46  
solarofthesix
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
im no trained tech, but the 643's look like the way to go
 
Old 12-27-2006, 08:46 AM
  #47  
Registered User
 
METALBEAST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 261
The 561s are on the 96-97 LT1s correct? That sux for me
METALBEAST is offline  
Old 12-27-2006, 08:21 PM
  #48  
Registered User
 
billk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 37
A little off topic but i have a set of steel lt1 heads off a 94 caprice , I heard they flow a tad better than stockers , also have a set a edelbrocks untouched, intend on throwing the motor in a carburated 67 comaro, which heads to use with a mild (500) lift cam?
billk1 is offline  
Old 01-03-2007, 01:19 PM
  #49  
Registered User
 
METALBEAST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 261
Originally Posted by billk1
A little off topic but i have a set of steel lt1 heads off a 94 caprice , I heard they flow a tad better than stockers , also have a set a edelbrocks untouched, intend on throwing the motor in a carburated 67 comaro, which heads to use with a mild (500) lift cam?

The iron heads do flow a tad better (about 10%) but the larger combustion chambers means its gonna lower your CR even with some thinner Impalla head gaskets.
METALBEAST is offline  
Old 01-25-2007, 01:15 PM
  #50  
Registered User
 
rickreeves1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: La.
Posts: 270
Originally Posted by DrewHMS97SS
How do the LT4 heads compare in-line with this conversation?
Originally Posted by cino
???
I thought the 374s are the thickest.
I'd like to know what's the ultimate head for porting? 374 or 643?
Does any know?

Also, how could one tell how much extra hp could be had from porting ....
LT1 castings vs. LT4 vs. Trickflow vs. Edelbrock vs. AFR?

In order which are best and how far apart are they?

Could the LT4's be worth 10 more? Would the Trickflows potential be worth 20 more hp etc.. I don't seem to have ever been able to get an answer on that question, just recommendations. Just trying to learn and make the best decision.

Thanks

Last edited by rickreeves1; 01-25-2007 at 01:22 PM.
rickreeves1 is offline  
Old 01-25-2007, 02:54 PM
  #51  
Registered User
 
MeanGreen97Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: TX
Posts: 3,523
Potential of the castings are in the hands of the porter and the cam designer. I've seen ported stock castings make more power than ported trick flows simply because of cam selection.
MeanGreen97Z is offline  
Old 01-25-2007, 03:17 PM
  #52  
Registered User
 
rickreeves1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: La.
Posts: 270
Originally Posted by rickreeves1
Does any know?

Also, how could one tell how much extra hp could be had from porting ....
LT1 castings vs. LT4 vs. Trickflow vs. Edelbrock vs. AFR?

In order which are best and how far apart are they?

Could the LT4's be worth 10 more? Would the Trickflows potential be worth 20 more hp etc.. I don't seem to have ever been able to get an answer on that question, just recommendations. Just trying to learn and make the best decision.

Thanks
Originally Posted by MeanGreen97Z
Potential of the castings are in the hands of the porter and the cam designer. I've seen ported stock castings make more power than ported trick flows simply because of cam selection.

I get that but what if it was same porter/quality and the same cam?? What would be the choice of heads for porting, in order, and approximately how much difference would each step up make if any?

Thanks

Last edited by rickreeves1; 01-25-2007 at 03:22 PM.
rickreeves1 is offline  
Old 01-25-2007, 03:38 PM
  #53  
Registered User
 
Critter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: fort worth/burleson Tx
Posts: 1,511
374 or 643, then the 561's

i think they can just more flow out of the 374's because there is more to take out of them.
Critter is offline  
Old 01-25-2007, 06:49 PM
  #54  
Registered User
 
Pig Pen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Fort Smith, Arkansas
Posts: 196
This is probably a question for Mr. Elliot himself but; If your just going with the LE1 heads does it matter which casting number is used?

Last edited by Pig Pen; 01-27-2007 at 08:31 PM.
Pig Pen is offline  
Old 01-26-2007, 11:28 AM
  #55  
Registered User
 
rickreeves1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: La.
Posts: 270
Originally Posted by Pig Pen
This is probably a question for Mr. Eliot himse but; If your just going with the LE1 heads does it matter which casting number is used?
I want to go with the best porting available for the heads. This is for my current stock block but eventually for a 396 short block.
rickreeves1 is offline  
Old 02-01-2007, 04:16 PM
  #56  
Registered User
 
rickreeves1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: La.
Posts: 270
Originally Posted by rickreeves1
Does any know?

Also, how could one tell how much extra hp could be had from porting ....
LT1 castings vs. LT4 vs. Trickflow vs. Edelbrock vs. AFR?

In order which are best and how far apart are they?

Could the LT4's be worth 10 more? Would the Trickflows potential be worth 20 more hp etc.. I don't seem to have ever been able to get an answer on that question, just recommendations. Just trying to learn and make the best decision.

Thanks
Originally Posted by rickreeves1
I get that but what if it was same porter/quality and the same cam?? What would be the choice of heads for porting, in order, and approximately how much difference would each step up make if any?

Thanks
Originally Posted by rickreeves1
I want to go with the best porting available for the heads. This is for my current stock block with a 125 N2O but eventually for a 396 short block with a bigger shot.
The new AFR Eliminators are tempting me also.
Paging Mr. Lloyd and StrokerAce?? Please see question in first quote above.

Thanks

ttt
rickreeves1 is offline  
Old 02-02-2007, 03:43 PM
  #57  
Banned
 
SStrokerAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
T/A LT1 (aka Later, Clint) on here is going from a LE ported TFS to a LE3 stock casting setup on his 355 and from what Lloyd told me on the phone yesterday it should walk all over the TFS castings on that motor.

On a stroker its a different game, a TFS head will work very well. But if you are going to do a stock or 355 cube motor then go with the stroker later on a LE3 head would work killer for you. Just change the cams when you change the cubes.

Bret
SStrokerAce is offline  
Old 02-11-2007, 10:01 PM
  #58  
Registered User
 
airflowdevelop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: York, PA
Posts: 203
Trivia question...why are 561 castings in a shortage currently, if they are so bad?

Found this thread by accident...Bret, you are not allowed to answer!

Dennis
airflowdevelop is offline  
Old 02-11-2007, 10:02 PM
  #59  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Javier97Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Jupiter (NPB), Fl
Posts: 3,852
Hey I'm curious now too! I sold my 561's to port 643's.. what's up?
Javier97Z28 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Victor Lamb
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
3
08-26-2017 02:52 PM
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
10-31-2016 11:09 AM
edman
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
3
01-25-2015 02:41 PM
Catmaigne
Parts For Sale
4
12-25-2014 12:16 PM
kizz
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
31
09-04-2002 01:17 PM



Quick Reply: Side by side image of 643 vs. 561 castings inside..



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:37 AM.