LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Wanting dyno results from AFR 210's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-09-2004, 04:30 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Denny McLain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Double Oak TX
Posts: 752
Wanting dyno results from AFR 210's

Those of you whom own the competition ported AFR 210’s, (part #1101) can you share with me a little dyno data on how they compare to other heads you have owned?

I’m being pulled a few different directions as one person is saying to buy a set of the competition ported 210’s and let him clean up the the CNC porting. Claims he can pick up 10-15 cfm over the factory work. Another person I know is recommending LT4 heads over the AFR 210’s. Says they will make more power.

The potential kicker is I would have to buy LT4 castings and the AFR’s are quite a bit cheaper to buy factory CNC porting and then have them tweaked. Both people are very knowledgeable and reputable so there may not be any losers in the bunch.

They will be going on a 12 to 1 compression 385ci motor with a GTP 6 cam.

Anybody have actually dyno data to help me out?? Sure would appreciate your thoughts.
Denny McLain is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 03:36 PM
  #2  
Advanced Member
 
Heatmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Under The Hood
Posts: 3,875
diddo kiddo
Heatmaker is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 04:34 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Red96Lt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Birmingham, Al
Posts: 2,253
Don't go LT4 heads. You'll have to buy a new intake if you do. If you're going to spend the money on aftermarket heads, go with the 210's. Obvously I don't have dyno data, JMO.
Red96Lt1 is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 04:55 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
llafro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: West Coast
Posts: 408
Don't go LT4 heads. You'll have to buy a new intake if you do.
From what I understand, you'll have to get a new intake either way (LT4 or AFR heads). Only the smaller AFR heads are LT1. The rest are LT4. In any case, with that big an intake port, even the LT4 intake may not physically seal the whole port (i.e. the top of the intake port could be visible even with the intake on).
llafro is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 04:57 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
mastrdrver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: O-Town
Posts: 1,817
Originally posted by Red96Lt1
Don't go LT4 heads. You'll have to buy a new intake if you do. If you're going to spend the money on aftermarket heads, go with the 210's. Obvously I don't have dyno data, JMO.
He'll have to buy the LT4 intake anyway bcuz the heads 195 and larger from AFR are made for the LT4 intake.
mastrdrver is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 06:04 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Denny McLain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Double Oak TX
Posts: 752
The intake is not the issue as I already have a fully ported LT4 intake.

I've had three sets of name brand heads flowed (227 AFR's - LT4's and stage II LT1's) recently and none of them come close to what the vendor says the flow numbers are. I'm currently having Lloyd Elliott rework the Stage II LT1 heads until I can find a head that actually does what everyone says it should do.

I've personally made 450 rwhp and 451 rwt with a SR 236/242 cam and 466 rwhp/425 rwt with a 246/252 SR cam with a set of GTP Stage II LT4's. The LT4's flowed 283/201 @.600.

The vendor of the LT4's I recently tested was talking 302/230 but when flowed, they were 285/201. Not bad..... but basically the same as my old LT4's. The same vendor whom did the 227 AFR’s and stage II LT1’s is a blatant rip-off and the numbers were way off.

I was there actually watching Jordon Musser dyno when he made 471 rwhp with a set of AFR's (don't remember which ones nor do I have flow numbers) on a hot motor so both heads can make pretty good power.

Based upon Jordons numbers, I'm tending to learn towards the AFR's but like everything else, the porters are getting better and better and things do change as I’m sure someone is actually flowing 300 cfm from a set of LT4’s…… but who??

Again..... I'm being told ty two good porters that one prefers the AFR's while the other swears on LT4's. I'm trying to get independent data to see which direction to go. So far I’m obviously leaning towards the AFR’s.
Denny McLain is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 07:45 PM
  #7  
Advanced Member
 
Heatmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Under The Hood
Posts: 3,875
THought the LT-4's where the better head to go with if you wanted more...power...period...

Why are they so negative all of a sudden...???
Heatmaker is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 08:26 PM
  #8  
Ai
Registered User
 
Ai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 786
While you can get a GM lt4 casting to peak over 300 @ 28," it isn't exactly easy to do safely & consistently. If you're having to buy a new casting, I'd go with the AFR... Their 210 competition cnc ported castings aren't bad, but could use some touchup work. I actually have a set now I'm going through and don't think an honest 10-15 peak gain is much of a stretch, even working more towards improved midlift #'s .

No dyno data however, sorry Denny .
Ai is offline  
Old 02-26-2004, 09:38 AM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Denny McLain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Double Oak TX
Posts: 752
That's OK Phil....... I appreciate your experience and wisdom. Thank you very much for your insights.

It's people like you and Lloyd Elliot whom should be appreciated and respected as your not putting out a bunch of inflated flow numbers. People buy heads off of advertised numbers and when the car doesn't make the power they expect, these other shops tell them it's their combo or tune. “Hey, I personally flowed them myself so something isn’t right as we make 450-460 all day long with those heads”…..right!

The "stage II" (you can tell I'm not much into stages) heads done by shop X (tired of bitching about them) were down a good 30-40 cfm flow on the exhaust from the supplied flow sheets.

Nothing in this world can convince me:

a. I’m the only person whom this has happened to.
b. It’s not done on purpose to simply sell more product

Anyway…… looking forward. Still trying to find a reasonable priced head that makes the best power possible. Something short of raised runner heads which need a sheet metal intake.
Denny McLain is offline  
Old 02-26-2004, 09:55 AM
  #10  
Banned
 
FASTFATBOY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Mobile, Ala..USA
Posts: 1,935
If you really want a set of heads that flow a no branier 300 CFM at .650 or .700, just get a set of conventional small block heads and have them converted. You can get Pro Topline 235's to flow 330 CFM@.700 with the right porter, mid lift numbers are strong on those heads. They also take conventional valvetrain also a consideration when using some AFR heads. Just have to get them converted to work on a LT1. And most likely will have less in them that a maxed set of 227's, and they will flow more IMO.


David

Last edited by FASTFATBOY; 02-26-2004 at 09:58 AM.
FASTFATBOY is offline  
Old 02-26-2004, 10:02 AM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Denny McLain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Double Oak TX
Posts: 752
The only thing that has me a bit iffy regarding heads converted to reverse flow is I live in Dallas. The summers can be a bit tuff and even with a BCool radiator and HD EP it get's a bit dicy with the air on in traffic.

Do the conversions cool as well?
Denny McLain is offline  
Old 02-26-2004, 10:44 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
383Z4ME's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 263
Hi Denny,

I feel your pain. I just got my race ready cnc ported 210's ordered just after Thanksgiving last year. They came last Wednesday. I am having them cleaned up and flowed by a local shop. I was too cheap to have them flowed out of the box. If you can wait about two weeks I will give you flow numbers.


Rick
383Z4ME is offline  
Old 02-26-2004, 11:50 AM
  #13  
Moderator
 
rskrause's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 10,745
Denny: I am sure a good porter could do more with the AFR's, there is simply more meat to work with.

Rich Krause
rskrause is offline  
Old 02-26-2004, 12:47 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
ledfootz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: conshohocken
Posts: 646
ive been researching about heads also and ive came to the conclusion that im going with the 210cc lt4 style afr heads.i havent decided if im going with the race ready or comp ready version.but when i do get the heads im giong to take them to a respected machine shop and see the flow numbers and if they can touch em up a bit to squeeze out every pony.is it worth the 600 bucks from the race ready to comp ready versions?
ledfootz28 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Steve69SS396
Track Kill Stories
15
08-10-2015 02:45 PM
MadMav
Parts For Sale
8
02-06-2015 11:02 PM
95chwagon
Parts For Sale
4
01-13-2015 09:19 PM
Brandon Wittmer
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
0
12-08-2014 07:53 PM



Quick Reply: Wanting dyno results from AFR 210's



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 AM.