LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Will this be a good cam for me?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-2008, 09:51 PM
  #16  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
pyro719's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: colorado springs
Posts: 502
Thanks 96capricemgr I agree I dont want this thing to rev past 6500. But I would like the power band to start @ 3 grand or so Because with the stall that is where the car moves when I go wot. I think I'll just throw a hotcam in it and call it a day since I already have the lt4 springs.
pyro719 is offline  
Old 09-02-2008, 09:56 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
LaredoZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Encinal, Tx
Posts: 343
Originally Posted by pyro719
Thanks 96capricemgr I agree I dont want this thing to rev past 6500. But I would like the power band to start @ 3 grand or so Because with the stall that is where the car moves when I go wot. I think I'll just throw a hotcam in it and call it a day since I already have the lt4 springs.
When i put my cam i was gonig to put the LT4 springs but a friend recomended the 918 behive LS springs. after reading up on the springs i kinda regret using the 918's.
LaredoZ28 is offline  
Old 09-02-2008, 09:57 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
The LT4 springs are NOT good enough for the HOT cam when used with heavy LT1 valves. The LT4 had hollow intake valves and sodium filled exhaust, both very light.

The LT4 springs are perfect for a LT1 with stock cam and 1.6 rockers.
96capricemgr is offline  
Old 09-02-2008, 10:04 PM
  #19  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
pyro719's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: colorado springs
Posts: 502
So your saying I need to upgrade springs just to run the hotcam?
pyro719 is offline  
Old 09-02-2008, 10:06 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
LaredoZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Encinal, Tx
Posts: 343
I've heard that sodium filled Valves are better valves. with a hot cam i'd get some stiffer springs. With a CC306 it was recomened that i used the 918's or somthing simalar. when i took the motor out and rebuilt it for my bro's ex it had some dual spring with dampner and it actually broke some of them. We used the 918's when i rebuilt it and they were taking everything we were throwing at them. So i guess i'd recomend somthing simalar to the 918's. very strong springs.
LaredoZ28 is offline  
Old 09-02-2008, 10:11 PM
  #21  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
pyro719's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: colorado springs
Posts: 502
Well If I have to upgrade springs, I might as well get the cc503 and some 918's. Do I need new locks and retainers as well?
pyro719 is offline  
Old 09-02-2008, 10:17 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
LaredoZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Encinal, Tx
Posts: 343
Originally Posted by pyro719
Well If I have to upgrade springs, I might as well get the cc503 and some 918's. Do I need new locks and retainers as well?
since the 918's are LS springs u need shims, locks, and retainers. the 503 cam is a very nice cam. a friend of mine had one in his 96 T/A and it ran very well untuned.
LaredoZ28 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rideordie
LS1 Based Engine Tech
9
11-05-2019 04:52 PM
oldschool
Parts For Sale
16
02-09-2016 09:21 PM
marineengineer
New Member Introduction
3
02-09-2015 03:59 AM
97TA-WS6-Con
Parts For Sale
7
02-01-2015 01:01 PM
Fbodfather
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
25
06-21-2002 04:12 PM



Quick Reply: Will this be a good cam for me?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:29 PM.