2-point vs. 3 point SFC's
#1
2-point vs. 3 point SFC's
I will be getting some UMI SFC's. I am just debating on whether the 3-points are better or will there not be any noticable difference. I do not do any autocross and I am not worried about handling. I am only interested reducing squeaks, rattles, drivability and straight line traction. Any suggestions would be great.
#2
The 3-pts. probably offer strengthening of the chassis, but the 2-pts. should take care of your goals just as well. When I had my 2-pts. installed, all the squeeks and rattles the car once had were completely gone and I definitely noticed a "firmer, stonger" overall feel to the car.
#4
The 3-pts. probably offer strengthening of the chassis, but the 2-pts. should take care of your goals just as well. When I had my 2-pts. installed, all the squeeks and rattles the car once had were completely gone and I definitely noticed a "firmer, stonger" overall feel to the car.
#5
i will be getting the bolt ins and weld them in later. not that this really matters but it is common sense that sub frames welded in will be more sturdy. i can't find any good info comparing the 2 vs 3-points subframes.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
95z_28_camaro_4_Ivan
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
13
10-03-2015 07:27 PM
alliance12364
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
6
09-17-2015 08:43 AM