4th Gen Rear Lower Control Arms and Panhard Rod?
#1
4th Gen Rear Lower Control Arms and Panhard Rod?
Hey folks, I'm putting Corvette ZR1 17x9.5 front and 17x11 rear wheels on my '97 Camaro SS. The people at AFS told me that I would need to upgrade to aftermarket panhard rod and lower control arms all with poly bushings so that the rear wheels won't rub during hard cornering.
Who makes the best, strongest components with the poly already installed? I'm headed to the 'for sale' forum, but I wanted to get opinions on the best stuff first. I once saw a panhard rod that was about an inch in diameter! While that may be overkill, I'd probably go with it considering the abusive driving I do.
Thanks,
Paul
Who makes the best, strongest components with the poly already installed? I'm headed to the 'for sale' forum, but I wanted to get opinions on the best stuff first. I once saw a panhard rod that was about an inch in diameter! While that may be overkill, I'd probably go with it considering the abusive driving I do.
Thanks,
Paul
#2
Re: 4th Gen Rear Lower Control Arms and Panhard Rod?
Sorry I haven't been here for a while and I now see I posted in the wrong forum, since this is probably more suited for the suspension forum. Maybe a kind moderator could move it for me?
Thanks,
Paul
Thanks,
Paul
#4
Re: 4th Gen Rear Lower Control Arms and Panhard Rod?
I'll move it to "Suspension......" forum for you.
There is an FAQ in the "Wheels and Tires" forum outlining what many of us have had to do to fit those wheels on a 4th Gen. I suspect most people who reach that point have already upgraded many suspension components. The ES poly bushings are more than firm enough, but they can cause handling problems due to suspension bind when encountering very hard cornering loads.
It makes sense that the panhard rod would need upgrading to prevent the tires from rubbing, and an adjustable one would allow you to fine tune it. The poly bushings aren't as bid an issue with bind on the panhard rod. As far as LCA's, I guess they are suggesting that you have to reduce the compliance that the soft stock rubber bushings, with "hollows" top and bottom provide. Poly will take out the slop, but can cause bind as mentioned above. The solution is to use a "rod end" on the axle end of th LCA and a poly end on the chassis end of the LCA.
Poke around in the "Suspension......" forum, and check the FAQ on "Wheels and Tires".
There is an FAQ in the "Wheels and Tires" forum outlining what many of us have had to do to fit those wheels on a 4th Gen. I suspect most people who reach that point have already upgraded many suspension components. The ES poly bushings are more than firm enough, but they can cause handling problems due to suspension bind when encountering very hard cornering loads.
It makes sense that the panhard rod would need upgrading to prevent the tires from rubbing, and an adjustable one would allow you to fine tune it. The poly bushings aren't as bid an issue with bind on the panhard rod. As far as LCA's, I guess they are suggesting that you have to reduce the compliance that the soft stock rubber bushings, with "hollows" top and bottom provide. Poly will take out the slop, but can cause bind as mentioned above. The solution is to use a "rod end" on the axle end of th LCA and a poly end on the chassis end of the LCA.
Poke around in the "Suspension......" forum, and check the FAQ on "Wheels and Tires".
#5
Re: 4th Gen Rear Lower Control Arms and Panhard Rod?
Quote: "The solution is to use a "rod end" on the axle end of th LCA and a poly end on the chassis end of the LCA."
According to Global West, you mount the poly end on the axle and the rod end on the chassis.
According to Global West, you mount the poly end on the axle and the rod end on the chassis.
#6
Re: 4th Gen Rear Lower Control Arms and Panhard Rod?
Spohn makes a quality product. People say good things about UMI too, I haven't seen their stuff in person. If you go with rod end parts, be sure to buy from vendors using top quality rod ends.
As stated above, on all poly/rod end parts, the poly end goes on the chassis.
More important, though is that you will in all likelyhood need to create additional clearance for those 11 inch rears in the wheelwells. Do some searching on all of the various F Body boards.
As stated above, on all poly/rod end parts, the poly end goes on the chassis.
More important, though is that you will in all likelyhood need to create additional clearance for those 11 inch rears in the wheelwells. Do some searching on all of the various F Body boards.
#7
Re: 4th Gen Rear Lower Control Arms and Panhard Rod?
Originally Posted by ABA383
I have had great success with Spohn and Hotchkis...Spohn is a little less $$$...
--Alan
--Alan
Also, if you do a search on Spohn's site for 'panhard' you get 8 results, and some are identical??? Do I need the panhard rod with both ends spherical, or just one end spherical and the other end poly???
This car is not a daily driver, it's purely for fun, and I have an SLP Loudmouth in it as well as a healthy stereo. I rarely drive it with the T-Tops IN... In other words, I don't care if these components add some road noise by transferring movement and vibration from the suspension to the body...
Does anyone know any other company that might have the LCA's with a spherical end and a poly end???
Cheers,
Paul
#8
Re: 4th Gen Rear Lower Control Arms and Panhard Rod?
Quote: "As stated above, on all poly/rod end parts, the poly end goes on the chassis."
So the Spohn website agrees with the above statement, the Global West website states the opposite...which is correct or does it make a difference?
The poly is obviously used to isolate noise/vibration and the rod end will eliminate binding.
So the Spohn website agrees with the above statement, the Global West website states the opposite...which is correct or does it make a difference?
The poly is obviously used to isolate noise/vibration and the rod end will eliminate binding.
#9
Re: 4th Gen Rear Lower Control Arms and Panhard Rod?
Originally Posted by OBE1 95Z28
Quote: "As stated above, on all poly/rod end parts, the poly end goes on the chassis."
So the Spohn website agrees with the above statement, the Global West website states the opposite...which is correct or does it make a difference?
The poly is obviously used to isolate noise/vibration and the rod end will eliminate binding.
So the Spohn website agrees with the above statement, the Global West website states the opposite...which is correct or does it make a difference?
The poly is obviously used to isolate noise/vibration and the rod end will eliminate binding.
#10
Re: 4th Gen Rear Lower Control Arms and Panhard Rod?
Originally Posted by 350350
Does anyone know any other company that might have the LCA's with a spherical end and a poly end???
Cheers,
Paul
http://www.spohn.net/product.cfm?productid=1294
spherical and poly Panhard
http://www.spohn.net/product.cfm?productid=1298
all LCA
http://www.spohn.net/category.cfm?categoryid=1041
all Panhard
http://www.spohn.net/category.cfm?categoryid=1045
#11
Re: 4th Gen Rear Lower Control Arms and Panhard Rod?
Originally Posted by OBE1 95Z28
Quote: "As stated above, on all poly/rod end parts, the poly end goes on the chassis."
So the Spohn website agrees with the above statement, the Global West website states the opposite...which is correct or does it make a difference?
The poly is obviously used to isolate noise/vibration and the rod end will eliminate binding.
So the Spohn website agrees with the above statement, the Global West website states the opposite...which is correct or does it make a difference?
The poly is obviously used to isolate noise/vibration and the rod end will eliminate binding.
Not to sure if many try the other way even?
#12
Re: 4th Gen Rear Lower Control Arms and Panhard Rod?
I'm running the Global West rod end/poly combo and have them mounted per their instructions (poly on rear axle). No complaints at all regarding road noise or handling.
#13
Re: 4th Gen Rear Lower Control Arms and Panhard Rod?
If its not a daily driver just go with Spohn rod end/rod end stuff. I use their rod ended LCAs and they work fantastic, but are a bit noisey. I don't care because I don't drive it everyday and the suspension works fantastic. I have a Hotchkis panhard bar Poly/poly that was on the car when I bought it and I'm going to switch to the spohn rod end/rod end one as well. Just give them a shout...Gordon and Steve (Spohn, father and son company) are good to talk to...
--Alan
--Alan
#14
Re: 4th Gen Rear Lower Control Arms and Panhard Rod?
Originally Posted by ABA383
If its not a daily driver just go with Spohn rod end/rod end stuff. I use their rod ended LCAs and they work fantastic, but are a bit noisey. I don't care because I don't drive it everyday and the suspension works fantastic. I have a Hotchkis panhard bar Poly/poly that was on the car when I bought it and I'm going to switch to the spohn rod end/rod end one as well. Just give them a shout...Gordon and Steve (Spohn, father and son company) are good to talk to...
--Alan
--Alan
In any case, thanks for the help... I'm going with the rod-end/rod-end LCA's as well as panhard rod.
#15
Re: 4th Gen Rear Lower Control Arms and Panhard Rod?
Originally Posted by 350350
Thanks man, that's exactly what I needed!!! One more question though... for some reason I can't get the link to work that shows you a big picture of the LCA's, and if I remember correctly the rear sway bar bolts to the LCA's, right? In the small picture of the tubular rod-end/rod-end LCAs, I don't see any holes for the sway bar mounting bolts. Do they have the holes, or did you have to improvise something with the tubular LCAs?
In any case, thanks for the help... I'm going with the rod-end/rod-end LCA's as well as panhard rod.
In any case, thanks for the help... I'm going with the rod-end/rod-end LCA's as well as panhard rod.
While your odering thing you may want to consider LCA relocation brakets, I know with the SS SLP suspension its right in the middle of needing them and not, but wouldnt hurt.