which is the better lca
#1
which is the better lca
#4
Re: which is the better lca
The tubular's are great. I've seen the Spohn tubulars help push a 3,450# 30th SS convertible to 8.60@160+ MPH, with a 1.30 60-ft time. Definitely strong enough, and less weight then the box-section arms.
#5
Re: which is the better lca
Aftermarket overbuilds everything. If tubular are strong enough for 1.3 60' times, then why make boxed ones? It's just so they can get more money for something you don't really need. Unless of course your car is speedygonzales and can pull off .8 60' times
#6
Re: which is the better lca
Originally Posted by MyShibbyZ28
Aftermarket overbuilds everything. If tubular are strong enough for 1.3 60' times, then why make boxed ones? It's just so they can get more money for something you don't really need. Unless of course your car is speedygonzales and can pull off .8 60' times
As for the original question, go with tubular ones with rod/poly ends.
#7
Re: which is the better lca
Originally Posted by Camaro_Maniac63
Actually, it is probably the other way around. Aftermarket doesn't really have liability concerns since they sell their products as "off-road" parts with no guarantees implied. However OEM parts have to be very safe and last a fairly decent amount of time without problems. One great example of how under-engineered aftermarket parts can be is K-members. Some people have broken one under normal driving conditions.
As for the original question, go with tubular ones with rod/poly ends.
As for the original question, go with tubular ones with rod/poly ends.
But I do understand that some aftermarket parts break easily.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
carguyshu
Parts For Sale
20
01-22-2017 11:19 AM
96SilverRam
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
7
11-20-2016 11:19 AM
Henson071
Parts For Sale
8
12-30-2015 09:55 PM