Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes Shocks, springs, cages, brakes, sub-frame connectors, etc.

disconnected power rack vs. manual rack

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2005, 05:44 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
12SCNDZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Newark, Delaware
Posts: 3,634
disconnected power rack vs. manual rack

OK...I want to ditch the PS on my '93 Z when I drop the new motor in. I really don't like the $600 price tag for a manual rack. There have been a few that have suggested just capping the power rack, and running it without the pump.

First question...Is this dangerous in any way?

Second question...Is steering effort dramatically reduced when swapping to a manual from a disconnected power rack?

Frank
12SCNDZ is offline  
Old 02-14-2005, 06:08 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
'93 formy ...'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 320
Re: disconnected power rack vs. manual rack

Capping the factory rack and running it without the pump is exactly what you DONT want to do, trust me the steering is way to heavy that way. It's virtually undrivable. You literally have to sit upward and use both hands to turn properly even when the cars in motion. From a dead stop or low speed (like in a parking lot) it's a nightmare.

As much as I don't like the $600 price tag for the Madman unit, I really have no other choice. I'm ditching the P.S. on my '93 Formula before I put back in the motor. I want to clean up and creat as much extra space as possible not to mention reduce some extra weight.

I had the oppertunity to drive an LT1 z28 last month that had the same madman unit and it's a NIGHT AND DAY DIFFERENCE between just "capping" the factory unit.

Once the car's in motion, steering effort is virtually the same as the stock power assist, you'd never know the difference. At low speeds though, it's a tad bit heavier (obviously) but still completely acceptable. I had no problems parking at all. 1000x easier to drive then just dissconnecting the factor P.S. Completely drivable in an everyday car.

Just save up the money and buy an aftermarket unit. It's worth it.

I'll be ordering up the madman rack in the next month or two after I order my AFR heads ....

Good Luck

Last edited by '93 formy ...; 02-14-2005 at 06:11 PM.
'93 formy ... is offline  
Old 02-15-2005, 01:03 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Alvin@pcmforless.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,614
Re: disconnected power rack vs. manual rack

Frank,

Our 01 Z had a short belt that I would run at the track. The damn thing is so hard to turn I won't let kelly run it that way.. Even at speed it takes quite a bit of muscle to turn.
Alvin@pcmforless.com is offline  
Old 02-15-2005, 11:20 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
mongse_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Belleville, IL
Posts: 1,450
Re: disconnected power rack vs. manual rack

Yeah, it's quite a struggle turning w/ the looped rack. The pinto-style rack madman uses has a MUCH better ratio in it. Plus, the racks are pretty easy to swap.
mongse_1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Keenan
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
10
01-19-2023 12:24 PM
Heathen1
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
14
01-02-2016 04:27 PM
mspennyhughes
LS1 Based Engine Tech
4
03-01-2015 03:50 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
01-29-2015 07:10 PM
XtremeLt1
Car Audio and Electronics
12
09-13-2002 08:50 PM



Quick Reply: disconnected power rack vs. manual rack



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05 PM.