Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes Shocks, springs, cages, brakes, sub-frame connectors, etc.

Do convertables really need SFC's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-25-2005, 04:59 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
AtlantaGAJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 76
Do convertables really need SFC's

So, I was recently told that the convertable F-Bodies have some extra reinforcement in the floorpan adn that sub-frame connectors are a waste of money. What are everyone's opinions on this?
AtlantaGAJoe is offline  
Old 01-25-2005, 05:35 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
BLACKBIRD8200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: LANSING, MI
Posts: 187
Re: Do convertables really need SFC's

Yes you should put sfc on. i put them on my vert last summer and it was day and night differance. 100% yes
BLACKBIRD8200 is offline  
Old 01-25-2005, 07:13 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Steve in Seattle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,445
Re: Do convertables really need SFC's

Whom ever told you the factory reinforcement is sufficient is talk'n out their @ss.

Get double-diamond SFC's and you'll see a night and day difference.
Steve in Seattle is offline  
Old 01-26-2005, 07:11 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
87DJP2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Florida. USA
Posts: 1,790
Re: Do convertables really need SFC's

Originally Posted by AtlantaGAJoe
So, I was recently told that the convertable F-Bodies have some extra reinforcement in the floorpan adn that sub-frame connectors are a waste of money. What are everyone's opinions on this?
If you have to ask this question, then you don't need them.
Your car must be a exception.
87DJP2001 is offline  
Old 01-26-2005, 08:57 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
respectirocz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Queens, New York City
Posts: 927
Re: Do convertables really need SFC's

every car has a standard by which it must meet or exceed in chassis stiffness, any convertible car looses alot of torsional strength since there is no roof to the car, its easier to bend a sheet of metal than a sheetmetal box/cube, too meet gm's own preset standards for the car they add pieces of metal here an0d there to increase torsional rigidity, to meet standards

plain and simple, a hardtop car has the most torsional rigidity, next up comes the t-top car, and lastly in torsional rigidty is a onvertible car (with its factory sfc's)
i'm told that a convertible car with aftermarket sfc's is still not as torsionally stiff as a t-top car but it is definatly an improvment, if u want the torsional stiffness of a hartop car, u need a roll cage, which defeats the purpose of convertible
respectirocz is offline  
Old 01-26-2005, 09:20 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Geoff Chadwick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: All around
Posts: 2,154
Re: Do convertables really need SFC's

I didnt get the double diamonds, I just got the BMR tubular ones. Difference is incredible. Jack up the front passenger wheel a few inches off the ground... and the rear passenger tire starts to lift! It killed most of my squeaks and rattles, improved feel, handling, and traction.

and BTW this winter I'm getting a 6 point roll bar (bolt in).
Geoff Chadwick is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ImNraged
Parts For Sale
10
08-19-2018 08:02 PM
2QUIK6
Cars For Sale
10
09-17-2016 02:31 PM
USN06
New Member Introduction
0
09-07-2015 03:30 PM
GusarskiSS
Exhaust System
1
09-02-2015 03:51 PM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
08-05-2015 08:35 AM



Quick Reply: Do convertables really need SFC's



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 AM.