Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes Shocks, springs, cages, brakes, sub-frame connectors, etc.

Need help with shocks please

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-11-2008, 08:58 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
JMG97SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Rockwell,NC
Posts: 153
Need help with shocks please

Can someone tell me if these are the Blistens I need? I searched and found slp Blistens, revalves, and HDs and Im getting confussed on what to get. I have an SS with the original Blistens still on it but the ride is gone and I think they are blown. I need a good daily driver.
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku
JMG97SS is offline  
Old 11-12-2008, 08:08 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Central Valley, California
Posts: 696
Get the SLP bilsteins, not the HDs.
bluz28 is offline  
Old 11-12-2008, 12:07 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Sam Strano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Brookville, PA
Posts: 715
It's a little more complicated than that I'm afraid.

The OE shocks on your car are SLP Bilstein's. They were tweaked fronts vs. HD's, but the rears were the standard HD's at the time.

Since then the HD fronts have become much more like the SLP's (a bit of added rebound damping). But the rear HD's have also changed and for the worse. That's the number you brought up from Summit. And it remains to confirmed if SLP is still using the HD rear valving. But it would seem so since the old number they used is no more. That "new" HD rear valving is a mess... it's got too much compression damping and too little rebound damping. In fact it's much more like stock DeCarbon rears than the older Bilstein's every were.

To get around this issue, I simply use an older valving that is still made and works very well. In fact it's the rear shock I'd use when I used to Revalve fronts.

So I'd recommend HD's, but not the way you see them everywhere else. I do a kit that uses the rear shocks we've been using for a long time with the new HD fronts (which again are basically SLP fronts).

I'm also an SLP dealer, so I don't say this because I don't like SLP products in general. I simply believe it's the best, known, alternative and it doesn't add a cost premium to do it.
Sam Strano is offline  
Old 11-12-2008, 07:04 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Kevin Blown 95 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,684
Originally Posted by Sam Strano
It's a little more complicated than that I'm afraid.

The OE shocks on your car are SLP Bilstein's. They were tweaked fronts vs. HD's, but the rears were the standard HD's at the time.

Since then the HD fronts have become much more like the SLP's (a bit of added rebound damping). But the rear HD's have also changed and for the worse. That's the number you brought up from Summit. And it remains to confirmed if SLP is still using the HD rear valving. But it would seem so since the old number they used is no more. That "new" HD rear valving is a mess... it's got too much compression damping and too little rebound damping. In fact it's much more like stock DeCarbon rears than the older Bilstein's every were.

To get around this issue, I simply use an older valving that is still made and works very well. In fact it's the rear shock I'd use when I used to Revalve fronts.

So I'd recommend HD's, but not the way you see them everywhere else. I do a kit that uses the rear shocks we've been using for a long time with the new HD fronts (which again are basically SLP fronts).

I'm also an SLP dealer, so I don't say this because I don't like SLP products in general. I simply believe it's the best, known, alternative and it doesn't add a cost premium to do it.
Hey, I believe you. Hell, I'd rip all that gay inferior GM crap off of there and replace it with the parts that you sell, but I can't figure out how to jack it up!
Kevin Blown 95 TA is offline  
Old 11-12-2008, 08:34 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
JMG97SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Rockwell,NC
Posts: 153
Originally Posted by Sam Strano
It's a little more complicated than that I'm afraid.

The OE shocks on your car are SLP Bilstein's. They were tweaked fronts vs. HD's, but the rears were the standard HD's at the time.

Since then the HD fronts have become much more like the SLP's (a bit of added rebound damping). But the rear HD's have also changed and for the worse. That's the number you brought up from Summit. And it remains to confirmed if SLP is still using the HD rear valving. But it would seem so since the old number they used is no more. That "new" HD rear valving is a mess... it's got too much compression damping and too little rebound damping. In fact it's much more like stock DeCarbon rears than the older Bilstein's every were.

To get around this issue, I simply use an older valving that is still made and works very well. In fact it's the rear shock I'd use when I used to Revalve fronts.

So I'd recommend HD's, but not the way you see them everywhere else. I do a kit that uses the rear shocks we've been using for a long time with the new HD fronts (which again are basically SLP fronts).

I'm also an SLP dealer, so I don't say this because I don't like SLP products in general. I simply believe it's the best, known, alternative and it doesn't add a cost premium to do it.
Do you offer just the rear Blistens seperate or do you have to buy the kit of 4? I think the rears are blown out on my car and really dont have the money for all 4.
JMG97SS is offline  
Old 11-13-2008, 01:05 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Sam Strano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Brookville, PA
Posts: 715
I offer them separately. They are $85 each.
Sam Strano is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RUENUF
Cars For Sale
6
03-13-2016 03:37 PM
karpetcm
Parts For Sale
2
12-16-2015 09:07 PM
Bigfatrat
Parts Wanted
3
10-16-2015 04:48 PM
football4life
Cars For Sale
2
10-04-2015 07:48 AM
Devinfoote87
Parts Wanted
0
08-06-2015 05:05 PM



Quick Reply: Need help with shocks please



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:14 PM.