SubFrame Connectors
#18
Re: SubFrame Connectors
Originally Posted by Z28_95RIDE
To whom are you asking the question?
thanks
thanks
http://www.umiperformance.com/2003.aspx
#19
Re: SubFrame Connectors
To the original poster, why do you want to make SFCs your first mod? Do you feel the chassis twisting, or any other particular reason making you want to get SFCs?
I will put my two cents in here. For 4th gen F-bodies, I think SFCs are one of those things that should be addressed only when absolutely needed, such as times when you launch so hard that you twist the chassis (which won't happen until you are making lots and lots of power and launching dead straight with no wheelspin), or you have previous bending of the chassis due to an accident etc.. I don't have SFCs on any of my three Camaros (all with 100K+ miles), and they all drive like champs with no excessive rattling (which some people claim SFCs fix) and the T-tops come off and go on with no problems. And there are many people out there who have auto-crossed or road-raced their 4th gen F-bodies for years, putting extreme stresses on the chassis, without SFCs and they do not have any problems.
Save your money for now, and put it towards something that serves your better (new shocks would be a great start, stock ones are crap). F-bodies were designed to be convertibles from the get-go, and the chassis is plenty strong for 90% of users out there. In the future if you turn the car into a drag-strip monster, then go ahead and put those SFCs in (but by then, you will probably need a roll-cage anyways, which would stiffen the car up considerably so SFCs still wouldn't be noticable). Or, if you really want to add SFCs right now, at least do the square-tubed 3-pt ones so you can at least use them as jacking points JMHO, good luck.
I will put my two cents in here. For 4th gen F-bodies, I think SFCs are one of those things that should be addressed only when absolutely needed, such as times when you launch so hard that you twist the chassis (which won't happen until you are making lots and lots of power and launching dead straight with no wheelspin), or you have previous bending of the chassis due to an accident etc.. I don't have SFCs on any of my three Camaros (all with 100K+ miles), and they all drive like champs with no excessive rattling (which some people claim SFCs fix) and the T-tops come off and go on with no problems. And there are many people out there who have auto-crossed or road-raced their 4th gen F-bodies for years, putting extreme stresses on the chassis, without SFCs and they do not have any problems.
Save your money for now, and put it towards something that serves your better (new shocks would be a great start, stock ones are crap). F-bodies were designed to be convertibles from the get-go, and the chassis is plenty strong for 90% of users out there. In the future if you turn the car into a drag-strip monster, then go ahead and put those SFCs in (but by then, you will probably need a roll-cage anyways, which would stiffen the car up considerably so SFCs still wouldn't be noticable). Or, if you really want to add SFCs right now, at least do the square-tubed 3-pt ones so you can at least use them as jacking points JMHO, good luck.
Last edited by Camaro_Maniac63; 03-13-2006 at 06:46 AM.
#21
Re: SubFrame Connectors
My initial impression of SFCs on a convertible is in this post:
http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread.php?t=435249
Definately a very differt car with the SFCs. Less twist and body
roll and applied power seems to be much more direct. And there not
even completely welded in yet.
http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread.php?t=435249
Definately a very differt car with the SFCs. Less twist and body
roll and applied power seems to be much more direct. And there not
even completely welded in yet.
#22
Re: SubFrame Connectors
Originally Posted by truedualws6
My initial impression of SFCs on a convertible is in this post:
http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread.php?t=435249
Definately a very differt car with the SFCs. Less twist and body
roll and applied power seems to be much more direct. And there not
even completely welded in yet.
http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread.php?t=435249
Definately a very differt car with the SFCs. Less twist and body
roll and applied power seems to be much more direct. And there not
even completely welded in yet.
#24
Re: SubFrame Connectors
Originally Posted by Camaro_Maniac63
To the original poster, why do you want to make SFCs your first mod? Do you feel the chassis twisting, or any other particular reason making you want to get SFCs?
I will put my two cents in here. For 4th gen F-bodies, I think SFCs are one of those things that should be addressed only when absolutely needed, such as times when you launch so hard that you twist the chassis (which won't happen until you are making lots and lots of power and launching dead straight with no wheelspin), or you have previous bending of the chassis due to an accident etc.. I don't have SFCs on any of my three Camaros (all with 100K+ miles), and they all drive like champs with no excessive rattling (which some people claim SFCs fix) and the T-tops come off and go on with no problems. And there are many people out there who have auto-crossed or road-raced their 4th gen F-bodies for years, putting extreme stresses on the chassis, without SFCs and they do not have any problems.
Save your money for now, and put it towards something that serves your better (new shocks would be a great start, stock ones are crap). F-bodies were designed to be convertibles from the get-go, and the chassis is plenty strong for 90% of users out there. In the future if you turn the car into a drag-strip monster, then go ahead and put those SFCs in (but by then, you will probably need a roll-cage anyways, which would stiffen the car up considerably so SFCs still be noticable). Or, if you really want to add SFCs right now, at least do the square-tubed 3-pt ones so you can at least use them as jacking points JMHO, good luck.
I will put my two cents in here. For 4th gen F-bodies, I think SFCs are one of those things that should be addressed only when absolutely needed, such as times when you launch so hard that you twist the chassis (which won't happen until you are making lots and lots of power and launching dead straight with no wheelspin), or you have previous bending of the chassis due to an accident etc.. I don't have SFCs on any of my three Camaros (all with 100K+ miles), and they all drive like champs with no excessive rattling (which some people claim SFCs fix) and the T-tops come off and go on with no problems. And there are many people out there who have auto-crossed or road-raced their 4th gen F-bodies for years, putting extreme stresses on the chassis, without SFCs and they do not have any problems.
Save your money for now, and put it towards something that serves your better (new shocks would be a great start, stock ones are crap). F-bodies were designed to be convertibles from the get-go, and the chassis is plenty strong for 90% of users out there. In the future if you turn the car into a drag-strip monster, then go ahead and put those SFCs in (but by then, you will probably need a roll-cage anyways, which would stiffen the car up considerably so SFCs still be noticable). Or, if you really want to add SFCs right now, at least do the square-tubed 3-pt ones so you can at least use them as jacking points JMHO, good luck.
#25
Re: SubFrame Connectors
Originally Posted by DiabloGT
i was asking about these:
http://www.umiperformance.com/2003.aspx
http://www.umiperformance.com/2003.aspx
thanks
#26
Re: SubFrame Connectors
Originally Posted by DiabloGT
does anyone know if these clea the true dual exhaust with an x pipe?
thanks
thanks
#27
Re: SubFrame Connectors
Originally Posted by 1stls1
Maniac63, that is insain to wait for the body to flex b/f you put subframe c on. By the time your tops dont fit right, its too late, I believe.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
autoxr166
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
0
09-25-2015 04:21 PM